Download
0 / 0

Ruling on using the church as a hall for activities for Muslim children

Question: 244710

What is ruling on using the church as a hall for activities for Muslim children. There are no statues or crosses, just some faces on the ceiling.

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah and his family.

Firstly:

It is makrooh for the Muslim to enter a church, because of
what it contains of images and statues.

‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: We do not enter
their churches because of the statues and images that are in them. Narrated
by al-Bukhaari in a mu‘allaq report.

‘Abd ar-Razzaaq narrated this report with a mawsool isnaad
via Aslam, the freed slave of ‘Umar, who said: When ‘Umar came to Greater
Syria, a Christian man, who was one of their leaders, made some food for him
and said: I would like you to do me the honour of coming to visit me. ‘Umar
said to him: We do not enter your churches because of the images in them –
referring to the statues. End quote from Fath al-Baari (1/531-532).

See also: Fath al-Baari by Ibn Rajab (3/240).

Ibn Rajab (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Maalik regarded it as makrooh to pray in synagogues and
churches, because of impurities brought in on their feet [as they do not
take off their shoes when entering their places of worship], and because of
the images in those places. He said: We do not enter them except in cases of
necessity. This was quoted by the author of at-Tahdheeb.

Most of our companions – i.e., the Hanbalis – granted a
concession allowing Muslims to enter and pray in churches in which there are
no images. But some of them, including Ibn ‘Aqeel, regarded that as makrooh.
Some of them narrated two reports from Ahmad regarding it being makrooh.

Many of our companions clearly stated that it is prohibited
to enter a house in which there are images on the walls, if one is not able
to remove them, whether it is a bathroom or otherwise. Among them are Ibn
Battah and al-Qaadi Abu Ya‘laa.

The author of al-Mughni said that the apparent meaning
of Ahmad’s words indicates that it is makrooh but not haraam. He also
narrated that from Maalik.

End quote from Fath al-Baari (3/240-241).

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him)
said:

The view adopted by most of our companions is that it makrooh
to enter a church in which there are images, so praying in it or in any
place in which there are images is even more disliked. This is the correct
view, concerning which there can be no doubt.

End quote from al-Fataawa al-Kubra (5/327).

Ibn al-Mundhir (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Praying in
churches is permissible, because they are included in the general meaning of
the hadith, “The earth has been made a place of prostration [i.e., prayer]
and a means of purification for me.” But it is makrooh to enter places in
which there are images, such as churches and other places.

End quote from al-Awsat (2/194).

With regard to what is reported from some of the early
generations that they prayed in churches, perhaps those churches were free
of images.

Ibn Rajab (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Ibn al-Mundhir and others narrated a condcession allowing
that – i.e., praying in churches – from a number of scholars including Abu
Moosa, al-Hasan, ash-Shu‘bi, an-Nakha‘i, ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-‘Azeez,
al-Awzaa‘i, and Sa‘eed ibn ‘Abd al-‘Azeez, and this view was favoured by Ibn
al-Mundhir.

However most of that which has been narrated from the early
generations concerning that has to do with individual cases that cannot be
general in application. Therefore it is possible to interpret them as
referring to churches in which there were no images.

End quote from Fath al-Baari (3/241).

With regard to the report that was quoted as evidence by Ibn
Qudaamah (may Allah have mercy on him), when he said:

Ibn ‘Aa’idh narrated in Futooh ash-Shaam that when
‘Umar came to Greater Syria, the Christians made some food for him and
invited him, and he said: Where is it? They said: In the church. So he
refused to go, and he said to ‘Ali: Go with the people, and let them eat
lunch. So ‘Ali went with the people and they entered the church, and he and
the Muslims ate lunch. ‘Ali looked at the images and said: What blame would
there be on Ameer al-Mu’mineen [i.e., ‘Umar] if he came in and ate? This is
indicative of their unanimous agreement on the permissibility of entering
churches when there are images in them. End quote from al-Mughni
(10/203),

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allah have mercy on him) mentioned this
report in his book Ighaathat al-Lahfaan (1/290), and the commentator
on the book made a comment on it which indicates that the report is da‘eef
(weak), as he said:

Ibn Qudaamah attributed this to Ibn ‘Aa’idh in Futooh
ash-Shaam. It was narrated by Ibn ‘Asaakir in Taarekh Dimashq
(42/6) via Ibn ‘Aa’idh from al-Waleed who said: ‘Abdullah ibn Ziyaad ibn
Sam‘aan and Hishaam ibn Sa‘d told us from Naafi‘… And he narrated a similar
story. But ‘Abdullah ibn Ziyaad is matrook (i.e., his hadith is rejected)
and was accused of lying. End quote.

Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

It should be noted that the words of ‘Umar clearly indicate
that what some shaykhs do, of attending churches that are filled with images
and statues, at the request of some people in authority and others, is
wrong.

End quote from Adaab az-Zafaaf (p. 165).

Secondly:

Another point that reinforces the prohibition on this matter
is the fact that allowing children to enter churches in your situation is
something for which there is no shar‘i need whatsoever. At the same time, it
may do a great deal of harm to their religious commitment, because at this
age religious commitment is usually not yet fully established in children’s
hearts, so letting them become accustomed to entering churches may weaken
the sense of al-wala’ wal-bara’ [loyalty to fellow Muslims and disavowal of
disbelievers] in their hearts, may lead to a failure to resent disbelief and
places of disbelief, and a failure to disavow it in one’s heart, as we see
among many of those who enter places where evils are committed. Frequently
mixing with such people inevitably has an effect on the individual.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him)
said:

We have seen that in the case of Jews and Christians who mix
with the Muslims, their degree of disbelief is less than that of others. We
have also seen that Muslims who mix a great deal with Jews and Christians
are weaker in faith than others who mix only with Muslims.

End quote from Iqtida’ as-Siraat al-Mustaqeem (1/488).

Conclusion:

It is makrooh to enter churches in which there are images and
statues, and it is more emphatically makrooh – and may reach the point of
being haraam – if entering those places will result in negative consequences
and will not serve any significant shar‘i interest.

And Allah knows best.

Source

Islam Q&A

Was this answer helpful?

at email

Our newsletter

To join our newsletter please add your email below

phone

IslamQA App

For a quick access to our content and offline browsing

download iosdownload android
at email

Our newsletter

To join our newsletter please add your email below

phone

IslamQA App

For a quick access to our content and offline browsing

download iosdownload android